Tuesday, April 12, 2011

American Negroes : Their Own Country - Why It Didn't Happen (1865 to 1964) - Page 2


Main Menu Page                       
   
                                                                 Page [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
II. Occupational Ranking & The Evolution Of Integration
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


So, on page one,  I addressed the fact that those of African descent in America after 1865 were in fact legally free, free as a distinct people could be. The effort being on the part of white people was to make the Negro race a self-reliant race - a race that would not be permanently, and in perpetuity,   dependants of the white race. Of course, for Negro men, particularly those who were former slaves, becoming leaders and providers for their people, as well as moving their race toward self-reliance, this was an edification process that was going to require some time.  But the message from white males was always consistently clear, and many times even violently demonstrated, that white males did not want Negroes in their living arrangements, in their working environments, or involved in their political environments. Many Negroes were certainly frustrated by this attitude, many understood and others, they wanted in...but had to believe that that was not likely ever to become a reality. After all, it was white males that created all the economic environments and all the political environments in America - in which they jealously regarded as their status environments. The solution for the Negro race was obvious: A homeland in America. 

This leads us, again, to  our ONE question from page one: 

     Why didn’t people of African descent in America from 1865 to 1964 demand a homeland in America, whereby they could achieve mastery over their own destiny, and create their own DMG - their own society - separate and autonomous from the American DMG? 

     Since integration was so vigorously sought by Negro males (achieved in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act),  and for such a long period of time (since 1865), it stands to reason that something within American males’ society had to be very attractive to them to make such a lengthily supplication. So let us form the following hypothesis:
 
     Negro males intuitively believed what existed in the living/ working environments of the American males (the American males’ society i.e. his social stratification system) existed because of the racial group's culture and very likely would not exist among the Negro race - because of Negro culture - if they sought separation and autonomy. 

First, how the word “culture” is going to be used here requires a short explanation. The word culture, as it relates to a human society, is going to be divided into innate and non-innate.
  • Innate-culture:  The innate-culture resides within the male and becomes discernible when his male-group forms its society i.e. its social stratification system.1  Essentially, an innate-culture is a grouping characteristic shared by the whole male group. And, for the sake of our discussion here, the innate-culture will only be used to identify whether the male group can form an occupational ranking social stratification system.  In other words, a male-group's innate-culture is either occupational ranking or non-occupational ranking. So if the innate-culture within the male group will not allow a social stratification system based on occupational ranking of the males, then the male-group will use a non-occupational ranking social stratification system (e.g. animal husbandry; subsistence farming). 
  • Non-innate-culture:  Non-innate-culture within a society involves all those things that make the male-group’s society distinct, other than race (e.g. language, status symbols, religion, style of dress, diet, folklore, etc). Naturally, only a non-innate-culture can be taught.
  
Note: I am not going to delve into the theoretical origin of the Occupational Ranking culture. I have included a MAP (under construction) tracing the origins of the Occupational Ranking system as it concerns Western Civilization. This is not theoretical.


Occupational Ranking & The Production of "Wealth" 

"Occupational Ranking is an innate-culture of the male-group (excluding females) that allows the male group to achieve the necessary grouping and organizational behavior conducive to the production of "wealth." Wealth is basically the production of marketable material items. The better the male group is at stratifying itself under occupational titles, the more marketable wealth they will theoretically be capable of creating."
   
-------------------------------

1. The creation of a human 'society' has essentially always followed the same pattern: A male-group (males racially, linguistically and religiously similar) first claim a geographic area. This same male-group then creates a social stratification system  (to rank males within their own male group).  When the social stratification system is created,  a "society" now exists. The male-group that created the society becomes the Dominant Male Group (DMG).  Historically, societies have stratified their DMGs by either Occupational Ranking or Non-Occupational Ranking.  
-------------------------------------

                                                        PART III>>CLICK HERE 

                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Evolution Of Integration Link

5 comments:

  1. Very interesting. Where's pg 3?

    ReplyDelete
  2. We're living on page 3. Everything's the same other than the right to actually call a black person 'black', a black murderer a 'murderer', a black lazy worker 'lazy' or anything negative toward blacks. We have to pretend that everywhere you go there is at least one black person hanging out with your friends (see television) but oddly, due to lack of population control by blacks this is becoming a reality. One month a year we have to pretend blacks contributed remarkably toward white culture. We have to pretend 'diversity' means 'everyone' when really it means 'more blacks'- not American indians, not Chinese or Russian immigrants, just more blacks. We have to pretend 'diversity' (more blacks) is ALWAYS a good thing no matter who the black is, where they come from, who they are as an individual, or anything about them. In fact, just imagining a black will hurt you (even when you see this every night on the news) is bad- it's 'racist', but you can't say it. You have to shame anyone who uses their instinct or lifetime of evidence that blacks are a violent, dangerous people. You have to pretend their contribution to culture (poor sportsmanship, lack of civility, lack of impulse control, lack of simply acquiring the common language) is GOOD and beneficial.

    Page 3 is modern America. How I wish I could go back to the founding fathers and show them video of it. They wouldn't believe their eyes. This was never their intention.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am curious sir, what book did you get this information from?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's sad that the black male didn't stay on the path that God wanted him to be on, because if we did. Things would be much different today, than they are right now.

    It truly is mind blowing to grasp the idea that black men were the first group to ever want to integrate into another male group. But it's not hard to understand why that is. It also explains where all of this misplaced anger towards white men is coming from.

    When you said "Since integration was so vigorously sought by Negro males, and for such a long period of time (since 1865), it stands to reason that something within American males’ society had to be very attractive to them to make such a lengthily supplication." That helped me connect the dots, and this is what I came up with:

    The black family dynamic has never been under the black mans control, which is why so many black men don't know how to be good fathers or show respect and love to other black men.

    We were taught (mainly from black women) that showing love and respect doesn't make you a man at all. And because black women knew that white women weren't on the same level as white men. It was their mission to keep control over the black family, and to continue to emasculate their black husbands and children.

    You are right that no other male group as a whole, has asked for integration into a white male society, like us black men have. But we would be wrong to not look at individual examples, where other men of other racial groups have shown so much love and respect to the white male, that maybe we weren't the only non white males who needed acceptance in the white male society.

    If we go back to native americans, we can use Squanto as a good example. Here was an ex-slave who had escaped from slavery in England; spoke English fluently and was able to act as a field boss for the white male colonists. Squanto was also one of the only survivors of his tribe that wasn't wiped out from the European smallpox plagues years before.

    So with him knowing that, he still heroically helped the teams of colonists when they came to him for help. He was able to put aside his personal differences with the people who had enslaved him and killed off his entire tribe, because he knew that God wanted him to help make the colonists self-sufficient, and also broker treaties with the Wampanoag tribe.

    Also the Bible talks about the slave, and that disobeying their owners, would be the same as disobeying Christ. The New Testament says slaves are to treat their owners like God:


    Ephesians 6:5-9:
    Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, in singleness of heart, as you obey Christ; not only while being watched, and in order to please them, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart. Render service with enthusiasm, as to the Lord...

    Many black men who knew that their masters were also their God. Wanted to continue to show that loyalty and respect, by continuing to serve him in his white male society.

    But not only that, just look at africa and then look at over here. No black man could ever create what white men have created. And even though many black men see white men as their oppressor. They also see them as their fathers, which could explain why the achievement of our manhood, could only happen within a white male society.

    black men have always had daddy issues, so building something on our own would never happen....And because of the issues of the father in the household. That's another reason why we feel like our children are better off learning from white people.

    There's so much more, but I just wanted to say thank you for this website and your strength to help everyone see the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  5. next time stay yalls asses in europe and leave other folks wehre u find them

    ReplyDelete